Welcome to Scientific Literature. Our company has more than 50+ international scientific open access peer review journals. Our Publishing Company is an incorporation of open access journals and e-books the field of science and technology "Open Access". It is a scientific platform to new researchers to share their innovative thoughts to the global wide Urology: Research and Therapeutics Journal is an international, scholarly peer-reviewed, online open access journal publishing novel · The peer-reviewed literature is where scientists publish their research, and it is the source for scientific information. As a result, I spend a lot of time on this blog talking about it. I have explained how the peer-review system works (also here). I have provided advice on how to evaluate studies and how not to evaluate blogger.comted Reading Time: 7 mins
Peer-reviewed literature: What does it take to publish a scientific paper? | The Logic of Science
The peer-reviewed literature is where scientists publish peer reviewed scientific literature research, and it is the source for scientific information. As a result, I spend a lot of time on this blog talking about it. I have explained how the peer-review system works also here. I have provided advice on how to evaluate studies and how not to evaluate studies. I have explained the hierarchy of evidence.
I have provided worked examples of how to dissect studies e. Nevertheless, it was recently pointed out to me that I have utterly failed to explain something important and fundamental: how and where to find peer-reviewed studies.
So I am going to remedy that by providing a brief primer on how to go about finding articles on topics you are interested in, and how to get free copies of them. You can try simply doing a standard Google search, but odds are that you will get flooded with tons of blogs and websites, and it is a pretty inefficient way to find what you are after. A much better option is to use a database specifically tailored to peer-reviewed literature. First, I need to make it absolutely clear that this is not the same thing as a regular Google search.
Literally anyone can get a blog, write an article, and it will show up in a Google search. Instead, Scholar pulls from several academic databases e. Nevertheless, it is an extremely useful tool. It is a massive database that is very easy to use more on that later and even though I have access to more well-curated databases, Scholar is usually what I default to for quick searches.
Scholar also has the advantage of being a generalist database. In other words, it is not topic specific, and articles on medicine, zoology, climate change, peer reviewed scientific literature, GMOs, evolution, physics, chemistry, archeology, etc.
can all be found within its digital walls, peer reviewed scientific literature. Sometimes though, it is useful to use a more focused database, and that is where PubMed comes in, peer reviewed scientific literature. As its name suggests, PubMed is a repository for medical papers. It gets its papers both directly from journals and from author submissions. These submissions are checked to ensure that they are scientific papers.
For example, if you specifically want to see results from randomized controlled trials, include that in your search terms. Both databases also have very helpful advanced search settings.
For example, you can limit results to a specific author, specific journal, specific date range, specific word in the title, etc. It can also be useful to either include or exclude specific words or phrases. PubMed and Scholar both let you include specific words or phrases by simply putting the word or phrase that you care about in quotes, at which point they will limit the searches to articles that contain that quote.
This can be very useful if you are getting a lot of irrelevant results that include some parts of your search terms, but not exact phrases you are after. Conversely, there may be times when it is useful to eliminate a word.
This should be done cautiously, however, as you may inadvertently exclude relevant studies. So, while this feature can be useful, it should be used carefully, and it is often better to put quotes around a word you care about, rather than eliminating a word.
Having said that, quotes can bias search results and make it easier to cherry pick results particularly when using long phrases. So, use these tools carefully. Another really useful approach peer reviewed scientific literature to find one relevant study, then look both at the studies it cited and the studies cited by it.
Personally, I find the citations within a paper to be the most useful. If you really want to understand a topic, then as you go through a paper, you should note the references to related studies that are worth reading. Then, you can use the literature cited section of the paper and Scholar or PubMed to look up those articles and read them. As you read them, you should find yet more articles. As you can well imagine, the number of articles you need to read balloons out pretty quickly, and it is why scientists have to spend so much time reading.
This can, however, also provide a useful check for how well you have covered a topic. After reading a large number of papers, you should start to notice that peer reviewed scientific literature number of new, relevant papers being cited decreases. In other words, at first, the number of new citations to papers you need to read should be quite large after each paper you read, and that number will continue to grow until you start to get a good grasp on the literature.
Then, it will slowly start to decrease as you read more and more of the relevant studies i. Now comes the critical question, how do you actually get the paper without paying for it? In many cases, you can do so directly though Google Scholar or PubMed Scholar is particularly good at finding and including links to free copies if they are available. Failing that, you have several options. The first, is to do a standard Google search for the title peer reviewed scientific literature the paper.
Sometimes, this brings up copies that Scholar missed. You can also check Research Gate and Mendelely, but usually Scholar picks those up. orgwhich is run by Cornell and offers free, legal, open access to many papers in those fields. The second option which is often the best is simply to contact the author and ask for a copy. In almost every case, they will be more than happy to send one to you. I want to pause here for a moment to make a brief point.
Scientists do not get paid for their publications. Those fees to access papers go directly and entirely to the publishers. Scientists do not get one cent from them. To actually get a hold of an author, email is usually the best option. At least one author always includes an email address on the paper. Failing that, you can try to contact them via Research Gate, but at least for me personally, I find that to be an inefficient way for people to get in touch with me.
In contrast, emailing me usually results in a response is a few hours. One final note about emailing scientists, sometimes people feel like they are inconveniencing scientists by asking for a paper particularly people who are not academics or students so they write them a lengthy story about what they are interested in and why they want the paper.
If all of that has failed, you can go old school and drive to a University, go to the periodical room of their library, and read the actual physical journal. Is it legal? That is questionable, peer reviewed scientific literature. It has been sued several times, and it has had to switch domain names more than once. For obvious reasons, I cannot tell you that you should be using Sci-Hub, but I will tell you my personal view on the situation.
I think that information should be available to anyone who wants it, and I think that it is wrong for data to be locked behind paywalls particularly given how much research is publicly funded via tax dollars. I also think that the current publishing system is an unethical scam.
Then, the journals sell the papers, and, as mentioned earlier, the scientists get no money back. Every single year, millions probably billions of dollars of grant money are paid by scientists for the privilege of being allowed to publish our work. Meanwhile, the journals rake in billions of dollars in profit from selling the articles, and in turn, stopping many people from having access to them.
It is an insane system that robs scientists of countless amounts of precious research funding that we could be using to actually test new questions, all while preventing many from reading the research that, in many cases, peer reviewed scientific literature, they funded with their taxes.
Sadly, scientists are trapped in this system. We have to publish our research, peer reviewed scientific literature, and if we want good jobs, peer reviewed scientific literature, we have to publish in high-ranking journals, which means we have to publish in journals that charge us. Publishers know this and exploit it. So, if you want to know my personal opinion about academic publishing companies and whether or not it is ethical to bypass their fees via Sci-Hub, I say screw them.
This is somewhat tangential, but I think it is important, peer reviewed scientific literature. As you read papers, you should be taking notes and organizing your papers in a way that makes it peer reviewed scientific literature for you to find the papers again in the future. There are several reference organizing programs specifically for this purpose, with Mendeley and Endnote being the two front runners.
I started using Mendeley years ago before it was bought by one of the massive publishers I just ranted about and moving to a new system now would be too difficult to be worth it. It is free unless you need to store an ungodly number of pdfs, and it lets you organize papers peer reviewed scientific literature a lot of useful ways.
You can create folders in the program to store different categories of papers, highlight the text, and write notes.
Then, if you need to look at a paper on hurricanes, for example, you can just subset by that tag. On top of that, peer reviewed scientific literature, you can then sort by title, author, journal, etc.
Additionally, Mendeley backs up to the cloud, so you can access your files from any computer with an internet connection. It is very useful, peer reviewed scientific literature, and I highly recommend it or EndNote or some other program if you plan on reading lots of papers.
Finally, I need to make an important point about critically assessing the results you get from your searches. First, as mentioned earlier, databases like Scholar may return results other than peer-reviewed articles. I need to explain what I mean by this carefully, because this is not the same thing as the page charges I mentioned earlier.
For real journals, you submit your paper for review with the acknowledgement that you are willing to pay the charges if the paper is accepted. Then, the paper goes out for review by other scientists, and if it is accepted you have to pay the charges. These journals care greatly about their reputation and at least try to keep shoddy research from being published peer reviewed scientific literature see the next two paragraphs. In contrast, predatory journals are not real journals.
You pay them just to publish any junk paper without critically assessing peer reviewed scientific literature. They are frauds and should not be treated as if they are real journals.
Sometimes proper scientists get duped by them, but an awful lot of the papers in them are there because no legitimate journals would take them, peer reviewed scientific literature. Beyond predatory journals, there is a wide range in quality for journals. Further, even really good journals sometimes publish bad papers. As I have said repeatedly on this blog, the peer-review system is good, but it is far from perfect, so you always have to read critically and look for a consensus of studies.
Finding Peer-Reviewed Articles in Google Scholar
, time: 3:16Journals - Scientific Literature
In an attempt to maintain quality and ensure validity of the research being published, Science Journals subject the articles through a rigorous peer-review process, honoring copyrights. Science Journals may include various types of articles such as, letters, short communications, review articles, research articles, case reports, editorials, and other supplementary articles. The rules and guidelines of article writing as · The easiest and fastest way to find peer-reviewed articles is to search the online library databases, many of which include peer-reviewed journals. To make sure your results come from peer-reviewed (also called "scholarly" or "academic") journals, do the following: Read the database description to determine if it features peer-reviewed blogger.com: Marta Bladek Urology: Research and Therapeutics Journal is an international, scholarly peer-reviewed, online open access journal publishing novel
No comments:
Post a Comment